Kirjahaku

Formal logic, having been formulated by Aristotle, a renowned Greek philosopher, ruled unrivaled, as a form of reasoning, among the literate cultures for more than two thousand years. Its intellectual foundation was severely shaken by George Helel's idealistic dialectical logic, and was further discredited by dialectical materialist logic of Frederick Engels, Karl Marx, and Josef Dietzgen. But the university admirerers of formal logic learned to readapt its forms to the new conditions, practically incapable of revising its content. Rehabilitated, it keeps serving its social slave masters. But my evolutionary integrated atomic logic pulvarized it atomically, completely overthrowing its intellectual dictatorship, paving the way for a logic of atomic age. This book is " must read", specially for those how are famaliarized with dialectical materialit logic. Our educational system teaches us that our Universe is made of atoms, that these atoms are ubiquitous, meaning one atom is placed next to on another, with vacuum in between them. I find this description very insulting to the intelligence of man in twenty first century. In my book, by referring to, and relying upon two processes that go on in the atomic structures, meaning changes in isotope, and ionization, I have shown that atoms are integrated and interwoven, and that there is no such thing as atoms existing next to one another, as if they were distant, and indifferent neighbors. They provide all around existence for one another. If they were separate from one another, their internal energy would soon come to an end. The fact that atomic energy is eternally inexhaustible, beyond any doubt, substantiates that they are in fact interwoven, and integrated. Sub-atomic particles are being constantly born, and disappear, because of this interrelationship and interwoven-ness, and that calls for atomic transformation, and is an in-formidable fact of evolution. That calls for re-evaluation of our atomic physics, which is the foundation of all other natural sciences, and place it on two new principles, interwoven-ness, and evolution. If this is scientifically correct, we have to re-write all other natural sciences, to accommodate for this new foresight and vision. I critiqued formal logic from an evolutionary integrated atomic logic, because formal logic is a logic of the un-changeable, for ever the same thing, that preserve their identities absolutely the same and forever. This book is worthy of being taught on college, and university level, as an alternative to formal logic. But if I had offered a different summer time style bikini, I would have received more enthusiastic reception.

The Vantage Press, which published this book in 1979, wrote this review on the book " Most people think of science and philosophy as two separate and unrelated subjects. The author of this book, Hossein Dallalbashi, shows how this need not be so, and offers a through analysis of the relation between natural sciences and scientific materialistic philosophy. He begins by showing how Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels took the mechanical materialist philosophy of their time, and applied the idea of evolution to it, thereby developing dialectical materialist logic. The author points out how in order to be relevant, philosophy must constantly assimilate the discoveries of natural sciences. Lenin said such changes did not constitute" revisionism", a deviation from dialectical materialist logic, but in fact were essential in Marxism. The author believes the gap between science and philosophy is caused by scientists who are ignorant of scientific materialistic philosophy, and philosophers who think they can continue philosophizing, making sense and relating to people, without having to acquire a comprehensive understanding of natural sciences, and un-interruptedly incorporate the new scientific discoveries into philosophy. Mr. Dallalbashi points out how the separation has been harmful to both. Einstein claimed that his best students in atomic physics were those with having strong interest in scientific philosophy. The author discusses the atomic structure as the building blocks of the Universe, and how motion is inherent in all atoms . He then promotes the notion of self-motioned atomic dialectical materialist logic. Throughout the book, appropriate quotations are utilized from different famous philosophers and natural scientists, supporting the author's thesis. This book is scholarly, and yet written in a vivid style. with much original thinking by the author."

We are faced with a Universe that is atomically integrated, and interwoven, going through un-interrupted evolutionary changes, with human beings and other biological beings as inseparable integral parts. The incredibly unexplainable miracle of the Universe is that it is law-governed, acting as if it were moving completely in accordance with a conscious design. This is a contentious argument that is undeniable by believers, non-believers, and agnostics as well. There is nothing about the Universe that is acting chaotically. We could literally refers to millions of things that we encounter on a daily basis, and we could see that each unfolds according to a relatively regular pattern. Einstein believed that " God does not play dice with the Universe" Laws of the Universe are the secrets of the Universe that have to be discovered, regardless of how they came about, and what philosophical preferences we may hold. The resolution of practical problems, related to everything we do in life, will force us to go through the trouble of discovering these laws. All governments, with different religious orientations, possessing nuclear bombs, had to go through discovering the laws of atomic structures to do it. There are no Christian, Jewish, Islamic nuclear bombs, All bombs are non-religious, made out of the secrets of the Universe. There is no other way. Each science studies certain features or behavior of the Universe. But, it is the human beings, completely atomically integrated, and interwoven with nature, who are attempting to discover these behaviors, and laws. It makes it difficult because, the so-called investigators are inseparable parts of the processes themselves. Nothing in the Universe, beginning with the sub-atomic particles, through the stars, and Planets, can live by itself, for itself, and of itself, including human beings, because of Universal inter-atomic integration. So, how can an entity, machine, or a conscious biological human being, study other entities, or biological beings, in insolation, while itself is an atomic integrant of the entity being studied, and atomically influencing, even modifying the results of the investigation. Theories of knowledge, or epistemology study the relationship between man and nature, while he tries to understand the Universe. Concerning the importance of theory of knowledge, Einstein believed: " I can say with great certainty, that the ablest students, whom I met as a teacher, were deeply interested in theory of knowledge, scientific philosophy. I mean by " ablest students", those who excelled not only in skill, but independence of judgment...". Dialectical materialism has the most fascinating explanation of what this relationship entails. Fredrick Engels, and Validimir Lenin have two different views on epistemology, and I have, in this book, demonstrated that very delicate and distinctive difference, between the two, even though some of their followers believe that the two intellectual giants of the Left completely concur on the issue. They talk about the relationship of man to nature in acquiring knowledge, and what constitutes knowledge and truths, and are there any " absolute truths" in nature, and are they attainable? Can the investigator atomically influence, or even modify the outcome of what is being studied? or is the man only functioning like a camera, taking pictures of the Universe, without ever influencing it as Lenin believed. It is intellectually very disturbing that too many people in this country are completely unaware of it, unless they are educated on scientific philosophy. I spent my entire adult life dealing with this seemingly simple, but yet profound issue, which no serious scientist can afford to ignore, and no meaningful scientific study could be performed. I made a comparative analysis between Engles' s and Lenin's theory of knowledge, and a critique of Lenin's theory of knowledge, some forty years ago when I was a student at L. A Cal State Universi

Why do we write poetry, generally speaking, what is the purpose involved? Poetry, like any other forms of artistic expressions, like music, and painting, are the expressions of our hidden sentiments, in our unconscious, which exposes our inner feelings, and once presented in written form, it would make our feelings naked, which otherwise would have remained as untold secrets of our lives. Every body in his genetic make-up, and social experiences, is a natural artist. Billions of people never get a chance to express their artistic abilities. Therefore, we have a lop-sided culture, reduced to a very small minority, which have financial means to have their ideas known to others An artist could expose the short-comings of our society, and provide a new horizon for seeing things in different lighting, and new dimensions. We have to have open mind to decipher the personal and social messages in any artistic work.