Kirjahaku

Aristotle's theory of moral insight

John and Philosophy: A New Reading of the Fourth Gospel offers a Stoic reading of the Fourth Gospel, especially its cosmology, epistemology, and ethics. It works through the gospel in narrative sequence providing a 'philosophical narrative reading'. In each section of the gospel Troels Engberg-Pedersen raises discusses philosophical questions. He compares John with Paul (in philosophy) and Mark (in narrative) to offer a new reading of the transmitted text of the Fourth Gospel. Of these two profiles, the narrative one is strongly influenced by the literary critical paradigm. Moreover, by attending carefully to a number of narratological features, one may come to see that the transmitted text in fact hangs together much more coherently than scholarship has been willing to see. The other profile is specifically philosophical. Scholarship has been well aware that the Fourth Gospel has what one might call a philosophical dimension. Engberg-Pedersen shows that throughout the Gospel contemporary Stoicism, works better to illuminate the text. This pertains to the basic cosmology (and cosmogony) that is reflected in the text, to the epistemology that underlies a central theme in it regarding different types of belief in Jesus, to the ethics that is introduced fairly late in the text when Jesus describes how the disciples should live once he has himself gone away from them, and more.

John and Philosophy: A New Reading of the Fourth Gospel offers a Stoic reading of the Fourth Gospel, especially its cosmology, epistemology, and ethics. It works through the gospel in narrative sequence providing a 'philosophical narrative reading'. In each section of the gospel Troels Engberg-Pedersen raises discusses philosophical questions. He compares John with Paul (in philosophy) and Mark (in narrative) to offer a new reading of the transmitted text of the Fourth Gospel. Of these two profiles, the narrative one is strongly influenced by the literary critical paradigm. Moreover, by attending carefully to a number of narratological features, one may come to see that the transmitted text in fact hangs together much more coherently than scholarship has been willing to see. The other profile is specifically philosophical. Scholarship has been well aware that the Fourth Gospel has what one might call a philosophical dimension. Engberg-Pedersen shows that throughout the Gospel contemporary Stoicism, works better to illuminate the text. This pertains to the basic cosmology (and cosmogony) that is reflected in the text, to the epistemology that underlies a central theme in it regarding different types of belief in Jesus, to the ethics that is introduced fairly late in the text when Jesus describes how the disciples should live once he has himself gone away from them, and more.

Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul challenges the traditional reading of Paul. Troels Engberg-Pedersen argues that the usual, mainly cognitive and metaphorical, ways of understanding central Pauline concepts, such as 'being in Christ', 'having God's pneuma (spirit), Christ's pneuma, and Christ himself in one', must be supplemented by a literal understanding that directly reflects Paul's cosmology. Engberg-Pedersen shows that Paul's cosmology, not least his understanding of the pneuma, was a materialist, bodily one: the pneuma was a physical element that would at the resurrection act directly on the ordinary human bodies of believers and transform them into 'pneumatic bodies'. This literal understanding of the future events is then traced back to the Pauline present as Engberg-Pedersen considers how Paul conceived in bodily terms of a range of central themes like his own conversion, his mission, the believers' reception of the pneuma in baptism, and the way the apostle took the pneuma to inform his own and their ways of life from the beginning to the projected end. In developing this picture of Paul's world view, an explicitly philosophically oriented form of interpretation ('philosophical exegesis') is employed, in which the interpreter applies categories of interpretation that make sense philosophically, whether in an ancient or a modern context. For this enterprise Engberg-Pedersen draws in particular on ancient Stoic materialist and monistic physics and cosmology - as opposed to the Platonic, immaterialist and dualistic categories that underlie traditional readings of Paul - and on modern ideas on 'religious experience', 'self', 'body' and 'practice' derived from Foucault and Bourdieu. In this way Paul is shown to have spelled out philosophically his Jewish, 'apocalyptic' world view, which remains a central feature of his thought. The book states the cosmological case for the author's earlier 'ethical' reading of Paul in his prize-winning book, Paul and the Stoics (2000).

Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul challenges the traditional reading of Paul. Troels Engberg-Pedersen argues that the usual, mainly cognitive and metaphorical, ways of understanding central Pauline concepts, such as 'being in Christ', 'having God's pneuma (spirit), Christ's pneuma, and Christ himself in one', must be supplemented by a literal understanding that directly reflects Paul's cosmology. Engberg-Pedersen shows that Paul's cosmology, not least his understanding of the pneuma, was a materialist, bodily one: the pneuma was a physical element that would at the resurrection act directly on the ordinary human bodies of believers and transform them into 'pneumatic bodies'. This literal understanding of the future events is then traced back to the Pauline present as Engberg-Pedersen considers how Paul conceived in bodily terms of a range of central themes like his own conversion, his mission, the believers' reception of the pneuma in baptism, and the way the apostle took the pneuma to inform his own and their ways of life from the beginning to the projected end. In developing this picture of Paul's world view, an explicitly philosophically oriented form of interpretation ('philosophical exegesis') is employed, in which the interpreter applies categories of interpretation that make sense philosophically, whether in an ancient or a modern context. For this enterprise Engberg-Pedersen draws in particular on ancient Stoic materialist and monistic physics and cosmology - as opposed to the Platonic, immaterialist and dualistic categories that underlie traditional readings of Paul - and on modern ideas on 'religious experience', 'self', 'body' and 'practice' derived from Foucault and Bourdieu. In this way Paul is shown to have spelled out philosophically his Jewish, 'apocalyptic' world view, which remains a central feature of his thought. The book states the cosmological case for the author's earlier 'ethical' reading of Paul in his prize-winning book, Paul and the Stoics (2000).

Dr Engberg-Pedersen shows how a range of problems encountered in twentieth-century interpretation may be overcome by reading the epistles in the light of ancient Stoic ethics. He discusses literary, conceptual and theological issues: for example, the unity of the letters; the relationship in the Pauline letters between theology and ethics; the logical character and shape of Pauline exhortation; the meaning of righteousness from faith; Paul's handling of the Jewish law. The author illuminates the whole world of the Stoics, and argues that scholars must move beyond the traditional Judaism/Hellenism divide to reach a comprehensive and accurate reading of Paul's letters.

This book seeks to do for the study of Paul and Stoicism what E. P. Sanders did for Paul and Judaism. Instead of making a brick-by-brick analysis, Troels Engberg Pedersen provides the first comprehensive building-to-building comparison of how the two religious/philosophical systems functioned. The book moves through the major letters of Paul (e.g., Philippians, Galatians, and Romans), carefully documenting Paul's indebtedness to Stoic thought.

Paul on Identity shows the inner connection in Paul's view of three distinct issues that all focus on identity: What defines the fundamental Christ identity for which Paul argues? How is it related to all other identities--of being a Jew or a non-Jew, a man or a woman, a master or a slave? How does Paul's understanding of the Christ identity inform his own way of writing to his addressees? The book raises the question of which among Paul's many teachings we may or may not accept. Finally, the book directly addresses the political relevance of Paul's thought for an American audience. Paul on Identity is written for non-experts and experts alike. By quoting liberally from Paul himself, Engberg-Pedersen brings him to life in the twenty-first century.

This volume collects sixteen essays published by Troels Engberg-Pedersen between 1994 and 2023 in which he analyses Pauline texts and themes philosophically, often using ancient philosophy (particularly Stoicism) as a comparison to invigorate traditional theological exegesis of Paul. Published in chronological order, the essays are preceded by a substantial introduction tracing their analytical development. This leads to a final account of Paul's message, bringing all the issues together in a single strand. Among the central themes tackled are the relationship between 'theology' and 'ethics', the logical form of Pauline 'moral exhortation', the understanding of 'flesh' and 'spirit', the logic of action, personhood and Paul's soteriology. Along the way, Paul's 'apocalypticism' and his relationship with Judaism gain in importance, with the analysis reaching its goal in an explication of the notion of the 'Christ circle'.

Paulus har spillet en central rolle for tænkningen i vores del af verden. Vi får her en introduktion til hans tanker og ideer. Paulus tilbyder nemlig – helt løsrevet fra den kristne ramme, han befinder sig i – løsninger på problemer, vi også står med i dag. For at forstå den betydning, Paulus har på vores tanker, må vi forstå Paulus på hans egne, historiske præmisser. Paulus var et geni. Men han var også en konkret og levende person. Han skabte ene mand et nyt og altomfattende livsgrundlag for hele sin samtid. At følge dette arbejde og se, hvordan hans indsats folder sig ud, er i sig selv spændende. Det gennemgåede tema i Paulus’ breve er identitet. Og her bliver Paulus særdeles relevant, for identitet er kommet for at blive. Men identitet rummer også en udfordring. Hvordan kan vi hver især vinde anerkendelse af vores særlige identitet? Og hvordan kan vi samtidig leve i det nødvendige fællesskab? Troels Engberg-Pedersen giver en helt moderne analyse af identitet og identitetspolitik og viser, at en kerneidé hos Paulus leverer en løsning på vor tids identitetspolitiske spørgsmål.

"Troels Engberg-Pedersen er måske den danske forsker og forfatter, der ved mest om den antikke etiske tradition. Han formår med denne bog ikke blot at formidle sammenhængen i traditionen, der går helt fra Sokrates og til den romerske filosofkejser Marcus Aurelius, men også at demonstrere traditionens liv, aktualitet og relevans for mennesker i vore dage. Centralt i den etiske tradition står den indre sammenhæng mellem lykken og det moralske liv. Engberg-Pedersen viser med de græske og romerske filosoffer, hvordan livet ideelt leves i lyset af et samlet greb om det gode liv, der nødvendigvis indbefatter relationer til andre i forpligtende fællesskaber, og hvor man som person bestræber sig på at være den samme over tid. Det er væsentlige budskaber for alle mennesker i en forvirret og forandringsfokuseret tid."Svend Brinkmann Denne bog er 2. reviderede udgave af bogen, som udkom første gang i 1996.

At forene antik græsk-romersk filosofi med moderne ledelsesteori kan måske virke en smule besynderligt, men det er det bestemt ikke. Stoicisme og ledelse forener netop det antikke og moderne, og får læseren til at tænke over hvad god ledelse egentlig er. Hvad er god ledelse? Denne bog besvarer spørgsmålet ved at klone to fremtrædende nordamerikanske ledelsesteoretikere, Henry Mintzberg og Joseph A. Raelin, med antik stoisk filosofi. Bogen argumenterer for nødvendigheden af at udskifte top down-ledelse med ledelse bottom up, der vil vise sig frugtbar både på bundlinjen og i et godt arbejdsliv for alle. Bogen henvender sig til såvel ledere (ikke mindst mellemledere) som alle, der selv bliver ledet.

Paulus var med til at grundlægge en ny religion, kristendommen. Men han vidste ikke selv, at den var ny, og ønskede heller ikke, at den skulle være det. For Paulus var troen på Jesus Kristus et stykke jødedom. I de sidste 40 år har forskningen forsøgt at vriste Paulus ud af det traditionelle, luthersk protestantiske billede af ham, som så ham i et indædt opgør med jødedommen netop med det formål at grundlægge en ny religion. Bogen viser med essays af både internationale og danske forskere, hvordan forskningen gradvis har gjort Paulus mere og mere jødisk - efterhånden så jødisk, at den senere forståelse af ham simpelthen er en misforståelse. Men bogen lægger også op til en kritisk stillingtagen, der lader Paulus være både jøde helt igennem - og samtidig i virkeligheden en medgrundlægger af en ny religion. På den måde giver bogen en læservenlig indføring i et af de mest sprængfarlige minefelter i udforskningen af kristendommens grundlæggelse.