Kirjojen hintavertailu. Mukana 12 016 292 kirjaa ja 12 kauppaa.
Kirja.info

Kirjahaku

Etsi kirjoja tekijän nimen, kirjan nimen tai ISBN:n perusteella.

1000 tulosta hakusanalla P.S. Herman

The Letter About Revealing a Science Cover-Up: The Revealing Letter

The Letter About Revealing a Science Cover-Up: The Revealing Letter

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
2014
nidottu
This is one of four identical books aiming to inform the public on changes coming about from changing the approach to science but in this event using nature to approach science. As said this is one of four identical books but for the length, cost and detailed information in the books. The one is called The Revealing Letter, which is this one and then there are The Informing Letter the Exposing Letter as well as The Divulging Letter. The pages supplying the information also indicate the degree of difficulty every book holds. The more the pages the more complex will the information be and also the pricier be. I offer this to give whoever wishes to read how science cheats an opportunity to read at whatever level such a person feels competent. I introduce the gravity that nature applies, which is not remotely the same as what Newton and science says what applies. If you don't believe what I say then yes I wrote this book with especially you in mind. What's the difference between how I see gravity works and how Newton's gravity work? Newton says objects pull while I say space compresses thereby collapses by getting reduced and everything in that space condenses. I say space reduces and Newton said objects in space pull each other. While I prove nature, Newtonian science cheats, corrupts and manipulate nature to make science work in ways nature doesn't work. I say there is no pulling but it is space that compresses by objects producing material movement in rotating of or as gravity. The difference between my approach and Newtonian's is one Universe away from each other. I show a functional Universe and Newton show mysteries of science. I prove everything that Newtonian science this far couldn't. I prove the Universe applies four keys by which gravity works instead of unexplainable magical forces. I show how nature works with the 4 keys while I show how science falsifies facts to make science seems to work by magical forces pulling. Read any of these books and find out the difference there is between how science perceives the Universe and how nature truly builds the Universe. What is nature is out there in nature applying the four cosmic laws and what is Newton is only in the imagination of physicists hiding the incompetence of Newton's concepts with a conspiracy never to doubt Newton. Read this and get wise to how science cheats to put up this fa ade to pretend they know all and they are correct about everything we know. it is about time we re-examine the senseless theories carried on for three hundred years and which promotes magic as science.
Vertaile hintoja
An Academic Introducing to The Titius Bode Law Book 3

An Academic Introducing to The Titius Bode Law Book 3

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
2015
nidottu
This book 3 shows in short how the Universe began when the Universe began with one dot. However the Universe never could begin and this contradiction I explain inside this book. Also inside this book you will read that gravity is purely electricity and the earth grows by electric gravity. This book 3 also show what global warming is and that has nothing to do with excess carbon in the atmosphere. Einstein's Critical Density lacks the accepted matching facts we need in proving the critical mass factor. But our inability in securing such required evidence defies the most basic logic. It seems all new evidence we receive from outer space is disputing all Newton laws findings that disprove Einstein's Critical Density as the answer. The universe will not reach a point of contracting, not withstanding whatever dark matter astronomers try to locate in the vast space. A grate rush is on finding the black matter to force the cosmos too retract back to where it came from. But what if our view of the cosmos was as incorrect as our views at present is about the sun? I prove that contraction is at present as much part of the cosmos as is the expanding we focus our attention on and it is our culture we carry from generation to the next generation that leaves the human view obscured in admitting the truth. Why would the expansion turnaround and do a reverse by going back to where it came from. Consider the momentum alternation such a change will bring about. The sun is not a gas-filled sphere holding hydrogen in its "natural gas" form, but it is all fluid and is in a liquid form where singularity is liquid- freezing hydrogen at 65000 C while outer space is boiling over at - 2760 C. This book explains the Roche limit in the practical sense... when applying cosmic laws instead of improvising cosmic laws uncovers that reality then becomes awesome. It becomes clear the universe is as much expanding as it is contracting and contracting by expanding. As there is no hot or cold, no big or small, no grand opposing but relevancies in ratio to one another. If you do not believe me, then believe your eyes when looking at the picture. What ever the sun is it is fluid falling into fluid. It may sound incorrect and unscientific MADNESS but with my applying of Kepler's formula in alignment with the position I located and valuated singularity it clarifies the possibility of the above statement... but please do not take my word for it, use your eyes and make sure you look past the culture bias of past incorrectness. See the fluid push out of a bowl of liquid, spilling both sides as it falls into liquid. The inside of the sun is not gas but it is fluid. In all of nature in all elements found through out science there is no NATURAL GAS as much as there is no NATURAL SOLID. Hydrogen is as much a liquid as iron is a gas and neon is a solid. It depends on the element relating to the space/heat in the circumstances surrounding the substance at that very precise instant in time. We have to stop telling the cosmos to show us what we wish to find and start accepting what the cosmos is telling us is out there that we should look for and find. Read this book and find out that the Universe is already contracting as much as it is expanding and it is contracting by expanding because it is through the contracting that it is expanding; the answer comes about from Kepler's tables that shows space is equal to time or a3=T2k
Vertaile hintoja
An Academic Introducing to The Titius Bode Law Book 1

An Academic Introducing to The Titius Bode Law Book 1

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
2015
nidottu
To help all those that never heard of the Titius Bode law I wish to give the following summery as to summarise what is said in book 1 we shortly discover the following. The following is the official explanation concerning the Titius Bode law. The Titius-Bode Law is rough rule that predicts the spacing of the planets in the Solar System and relates the mean distances of the planets from the sun to a simple mathematic progression of numbers. To find the mean distances of the planets, beginning with the following simple sequence of numbers: 0 3 6 12 24 48 96 192 384 With the exception of the first two, the others are twice the value of the preceding number. Add 4 to each number: 4 7 10 16 28 52 100 196 388 Then divide by 10: 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.8 5.2 10.0 19.6 38.8 The resulting sequence is very close to the distribution of mean distances of the planets from the Sun: Body Actual distance (A.U.) Bode's Law Mercury 0.39 0.4 Venus 0.72 0.7 Earth 1.00 1.0 Mars 1.52 1.6 2.8 Jupiter 5.20 5.2 Saturn 9.54 10.0 Uranus 19.19 19.6 For many a century science has been grappling with the enigma called the Titius Bode law. This conundrum had the most brilliant minds baffled and twisted without solving the mystery. This was one of the toughest there is because science has been going on and on and on without having a clue what to do. Nature gave science 3. ...And to complicate matters only to further as to confuse science nature made the numeration a series of 3 such as 0 3 6 12 24 48 96 192 384, which is just doubling the components. Understanding this is a tall order since it is only the most brilliant minds in science on earth that has to understand this lot. Then nature really got merciless and expected science to add 4 to the numeration. How more difficult can it get? Science was given 3 and then expected that the Brainy Bunch must be able to add 4... and this would complete the sequence How are those with minds that function on computing ability in mathematics suppose to be able to understand that when given 3 and then asked to add 4 come to a conclusion that this will total seven. Then nature made the riddle exponentially more difficult. Nature said that this distance of 3 + 4 doubles from the one planet's distance to the sun and then to the distance of the next planet. Science are given 3 + 4 and then they have to add to it this same distance as the layout doubles. Then they had to divide this with 10. For century after century Newtonians had no idea about this anomaly that nature threw at them. They understood, but to add 3 plus 4 and double this was too far to go and it had to be divided by 10. It was far better to leave something as complicated as the Titius Bode law alone and stick to Newton notwithstanding that nature applied the Titius Bode law notwithstanding that nature applied the Titius Bode law. Nature does not apply mass to allocate planets but use these laws and the Titius Bode law in particular to place planets in the order in which they are. I place these books on the market as cheap as I could to help me as evidence to support me in my fight against their falseness with which science holds the world at ransom. As you will see I solved the mystery of the 4 phenomena in cosmic space just because and only because I was the first person in 300 years that tried to add 3 and 4 and then reach a conclusion that it is seven. By my ability to be able to add 3 and 4 I am the first one (apparently) in cosmology that has the ability to come to a conclusion that 3 and 4 is seven I am the person that wrote the book on the working of nature applying gravitational density and I tell the truth that nobody in science wants to hear. I wish to present to you an approach to the Universe I think no one before me ever took and I managed to add 3 + 4 where i got a total of 7. By being able to do that I solved the Titius Bode law. Now I present you with the solution.
Vertaile hintoja
Dismissing Nothing? A Cosmic Birth Part 1

Dismissing Nothing? A Cosmic Birth Part 1

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
2016
nidottu
Think of what you wish and it was unavailable when the Universe started because it wasn't present. Whatever you are able to think of or not think of was not in place to be thought of at the point when the Universe started. Numerical numbers and numbers in order came eternities later as a thought that progressed from inventions that came before and forming as part of how the Universe grew into what became available. The number one was one such a number into which the Universe grew as one came as an invention in a planned future. You reading this were not a possibility. The words you read and the thought you think was not yet invented. The space from which to gather the electricity to charge the thought you use was not invented. What you are in terms of what you think you are was never yet a concept because being a concept was not yet a concept. It is said that Einstein proved that the Universe started with one point, a single point but as usual I am going to be different. It did not start with one point because when it reached the one point stage the Universe was well on its way to progress into what it is now, and opportunity already had value. I am referring to when opportunity did not exist as a concept because a concept did not yet realise. Please read very carefully for I have to use words that were not to describe events that did not yet take place to show what was never in place before. If I say there was blank then that is incorrect because being blank is valid by meaning in definition and blankness at that point had no meaning to form definitions because blankness was not part of what was in place. Even vacant ness was much more than what was available. The number 0 representing nothing was not in place because the number 0 holds a place and a space and a meaning and a symbolic value which was all still absent. If you think of a dot - not being there you are wrong because the vision of something forming a symbolic value such as the dot - was out of bound and the thought that there could be a symbol formed - was meaningless because being meaningless was yet some futuristic concept not yet conceived. Any shape of whatever form forming sequence was not yet conceived. A triangle was not yet in place. A straight line was something in the future and a circle was something not thought of. The law of Pythagoras was still to come as a master thought on which the rest was built. Numerical mathematics was something unheard of and being unheard of was what the Universe was still progressing towards but was not yet understood. Unheard-of was futuristic, something to progress towards. Being understood was unheard of because even nothing was a concept to progress towards as being brought by the future. It started with zero except zero was much in the future. When the Universe started there was no future because there was no past because there was no present. There was no zero because zero was still an idea to be invented because ideas still had to come. Even inventing was an idea still not part of the Universe. There was nothing except that nothing has a reference to something and when the Universe started there was no reference even to nothing. Even being in and part of a concept was still not invented because a concept was not invented yet. The fact that 0 meant something was not yet a practical part of the cosmic-idea because 0 was not yet thought of just because what we think of as meaning thought of was not yet thought of and thought of did not exist to be part of a meaningful Universe. Then came the Universe but as we think the Universe started such an idea is misplaced since it could not start anything before it first ended everything that was not. To start a process it had to end what was not a process and this changes everything we see in the Universe. This implicates the progress in time. Eternity still has to stop before infinity starts everything again and that is the process that is in place to this day.
Vertaile hintoja
1...3334353637...50