Anjali Prabhu

Analyzing art house films from the African continent and the African diaspora, this book showcases a new generation of auteurs with African origins from political, aesthetic, and spectatorship perspectives. Focuses on art house cinema and discusses commercial African cinemaEnlarges our understanding of African film to include thematic and aesthetic influenceHighlights aesthetic and political aspects including racial identity, women’s issues, and diasporaHeavily illustrated with over 90 film stillsFeatures selected stills integral to the filmic analysis in full colorMoves beyond Western-oriented analytical paradigms

Analyzing art house films from the African continent and the African diaspora, this book showcases a new generation of auteurs with African origins from political, aesthetic, and spectatorship perspectives. Focuses on art house cinema and discusses commercial African cinemaEnlarges our understanding of African film to include thematic and aesthetic influenceHighlights aesthetic and political aspects including racial identity, women’s issues, and diasporaHeavily illustrated with over 90 film stillsFeatures selected stills integral to the filmic analysis in full colorMoves beyond Western-oriented analytical paradigms

Critical reevaluation of the concept of hybridity within postcolonial studies.This critical engagement with some of the most prominent contemporary theorists of postcolonial studies reevaluates recent theories of hybridity and agency. Challenging the claim that hybridity provides a site of resistance to hegemonic and homogenizing forces in an increasingly globalized world, Anjali Prabhu pursues the ways in which hybridity plays out in the Creole, postcolonial societies of Mauritius and La Réunion, two small islands in the Indian Ocean, and offers an introduction to the literature and culture of this lesser-known region of Francophonie. She also reconsiders two major theorists from the Francophone context, Edouard Glissant and Frantz Fanon, through a provocatively Marxian framing that reveals these two writers shared more in common about agency and society than has previously been recognized.