Kirjojen hintavertailu. Mukana 12 595 353 kirjaa ja 12 kauppaa.

Kirjailija

C. F. Gethmann

Kirjat ja teokset yhdessä paikassa: 4 kirjaa, julkaisuja vuosilta 1992-2016, suosituimpien joukossa Umweltstandards. Vertaile teosten hintoja ja tarkista saatavuus suomalaisista kirjakaupoista.

Mukana myös kirjoitusasut: C.F. Gethmann, C F Gethmann

4 kirjaa

Kirjojen julkaisuhaarukka 1992-2016.

Umweltstandards

Umweltstandards

C. Streffer; J Bücker; A. Cansier; D. Cansier; C.F. Gethmann; R. Guderian; G Hanekamp; D. Henschler; G. Pöch; E. Rehbinder; O. Renn; M. Slesina; K. Wuttke

Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH Co. K
2011
nidottu
Im Rahmen dieser Studie werden aus naturwissenschaftlich-medizinischer, soziologischer, ökonomischer, juristischer und philosophischer Perspektive Notwendigkeit, Realisierbarkeit und Konsequenzen von Umweltstandards für kombinierte Expositionen untersucht. Auf Expositionen des Menschen - dabei besonders deren karzinogene sowie genotoxische Wirkungen - sowie Expositionen einer Auswahl von Pflanzen, anhand derer die pragmatisch dringlichsten Fragen beantwortet werden, ist das Hauptaugenmerk der Studie gerichtet. Auf der Grundlage einer auf Wirkungsmechanismen basierenden Kategorisierung kombinierter Expositionen werden Kriterien erarbeitet, die trotz der Komplexität der einzelnen Wirkungszusammenhänge eine Grenzwertsetzung zur Erhaltung bzw. Erreichung konkreter Umweltqualtitätsziele ermöglicht.
Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims

Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims

C. F. Gethmann; M. Carrier; G. Hanekamp; M. Kaiser; G. Kamp; S. Lingner; M. Quante; F. Thiele

Springer International Publishing AG
2016
nidottu
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts.The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims

Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims

C. F. Gethmann; M. Carrier; G. Hanekamp; M. Kaiser; G. Kamp; S. Lingner; M. Quante; F. Thiele

Springer International Publishing AG
2014
sidottu
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts.The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.