Gregor Betz

Das Lehrbuch vermittelt Methoden der Argumentationsanalyse, d.h. Verfahren, mit denen Argumente in Texten erkannt, rekonstruiert, in größere Argumentationszusammenhänge eingeordnet, kritisiert und schließlich verbessert werden können. Diese Techniken werden nicht theoretisch-abstrakt, sondern praktisch erläutert, indem sie auf zahlreiche Beispielargumente angewendet werden. Insofern wird nicht in die Argumentationstheorie eingeführt, sondern die Argumentationsanalyse vorgeführt. Hier lernt man wirklich, Argumente selbst zu analysieren. Mit zahlreichen Fallanalysen, in denen Methoden exemplarisch angewendet werden.

Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates. The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory. Aside from its consequences for discursive practice, the work may have important implications for philosophy of science and the way we construe scientific rationality as well.

Im Jahr 2010 fand im Ruhrgebiet das Kulturereignis Europas im frühen 21. Jahrhundert statt: die ‚Kulturhauptstadt Europas RUHR.2010‘. An dessen Planung und Durchführung war eine unüberschaubare Zahl von Akteuren über einen langen Zeitraum hinweg zu unterschiedlichen Zeiten an unterschiedlichen Orten in mannigfaltigen Konstellationen beteiligt, die dabei mit multiplen Taktiken und Strategien (zumindest auch) ihre Sonder- und Eigeninteressen verfolgten. Das zentrale Erkenntnisinteresse der hier vorgelegten ethnografischen Studie lautet, wie dieses hochkomplexe Ereignis so organisiert werden konnte, dass es am Ende doch ‚klappte‘. Genauer gefragt: Welche Handlungsprobleme wurden dabei insbesondere von den Mitarbeitern der zum Zweck des ‚Mega-Event-Machens‘ gegründeten Sonderorganisation auf Zeit – der RUHR.2010 GmbH – wie bewältigt?

Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates. The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory. Aside from its consequences for discursive practice, the work may have important implications for philosophy of science and the way we construe scientific rationality as well.

"Knowing, in order to predict". It was this leitmotiv alone that Auguste Comte, in the 19th century, considered suitable for the then rapidly developing empirical sciences. This view remains unchanged until today—not only in the empirical sciences themselves, but also in the philosophy of science. A scientific theory is and should be evaluated primarily on the grounds of its capacity to correctly predict observable phenomena. The aim of predicting takes precedence over the other important aim of science, namely to produce and purposefully manipulate phenomena by technical means in the laboratory, moreover, it even includes the latter. For if scientists successfully produce and manipulate certain phenomena in an experiment, they can ipso facto predict how that experiment will evolve under certain conditions. We live in a scientifically-dominated world: The more science progresses, the more important correct scientific predictions become. To a sometimes even fa­ tal extent we have made ourselves dependent on science and its results. Our scientifical-technological interventions into nature, yet also into social processes, cover ever larger spatial and temporal distances, and the consequences are ever more drastic given the increasing effort that would be required to reverse the effects—if that is possible at all. That is the reason why we ought to be very well informed about the consequences of our actions, in particular those based on science and technology.