Kirjojen hintavertailu. Mukana 12 595 353 kirjaa ja 12 kauppaa.

Kirjailija

John G. Drew

Kirjat ja teokset yhdessä paikassa: 24 kirjaa, julkaisuja vuosilta 2004-2023, suosituimpien joukossa Command and Control of U.S. Air Force Combat Support in a High-End Fight. Vertaile teosten hintoja ja tarkista saatavuus suomalaisista kirjakaupoista.

Mukana myös kirjoitusasut: John G Drew

24 kirjaa

Kirjojen julkaisuhaarukka 2004-2023.

A Framework for Enhancing Airlift Planning and Execution Capabilities within the Joint Expeditionary Movement System

A Framework for Enhancing Airlift Planning and Execution Capabilities within the Joint Expeditionary Movement System

Robert S. Tripp; Kristin F. Lynch; Charles Robert Roll; John G. Drew; Patrick Mills

RAND
2005
pokkari
How can the Air Force improve the planning and execution activities associated with developing intratheater airlift operations within the military joint end-to-end multimodal movement system? Recent operations have shed light on shortfalls in Air Force intratheater airlift. Using an expanded strategies-to-tasks framework, the authors assess current intratheater airlift processes, organizations, doctrine, training, and systems. This report catalogues identified shortfalls and recommends options for improving the Theater Distribution System. The authors recommend separation of supply, demand, and integrator roles and adoption of a closed-loop planning and execution process.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle End-to-End Support Considerations

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle End-to-End Support Considerations

John G. Drew; Russell Shaver; Kristin F. Lynch; Mahyar A. Amouzegar; Don Snyder

RAND
2005
pokkari
Evaluating current end-to-end support postures for certain UAV systems revealed that fielding a new capability quickly can have consequences for its long-term support and for testing and evaluation, training, and plans for future enhancements. Evaluating current UAV systems reveals that fielding a new capability quickly can have consequences for its long-term support. Here, the authors focus on current support postures and evaluate methods for improving current postures that may also be applied to future systems. Areas the Air Force should consider for future developments include budgeting to resolve issues that arise during testing and evaluation, training issues, and planning for standardization with future use of spiral development.
The Air Force Chief of Staff Logistics Review

The Air Force Chief of Staff Logistics Review

Kristin F. Lynch; John G. Drew; David George; Robert S. Tripp; C.Robert Roll; James Leftwich

RAND
2004
pokkari
Describes a review conducted as a joint effort by the U.S. Air Force and the RAND Corporation (acting as analytic advisor) to develop improvement options for mitigating wing-level logistics problems that began in the 1990s. 450-character abstract: Upon direction from the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, the RAND Corporation (as analytic advisor) and the Air Force conducted a joint review of logistics wing-level processes aimed at developing improvement options to mitigate logistics problems in meeting increasing readiness demands. The authors describe the analytic approach and results of this Chief's Logistics Review, as well as how the solution options designed to improve wing-level logistics processes were implemented, tested, and then evaluated at selected air bases.
Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces

Supporting Air and Space Expeditionary Forces

Robert S. Tripp; Kristin F. Lynch; John G. Drew; Edward W. Chan

RAND
2004
pokkari
Presents an analysis of Air Force combat support experiences associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and compares these experiences with those associated with Operation Allied Force (OAF) to determine similarities and applicability of lessons across experiences. An analysis of combat support experiences associated with Operation Enduring Freedom that compares these experiences with those associated with Operation Allied Force (OAF). Its objectives were to indicate the performance of U.S. Air Force combat support in OEF, examine how Agile Combat Support concepts were implemented in OEF and compare OAF and OEF experiences to determine similarities and applicability of lessons across experiences, and to determine whether some experiences are unique to particular scenarios.