Krister Andersson

Ska EU utvecklas i en federal riktning eller ska flexibla lösningar på konkreta problem tillämpas? Detta är ödesfrågan som EU återigen står inför i en tid då nya hotbilder växer sig starka i omvärlden och flera inom-europeiska utmaningar kvarstår. En tydlig framtida färdriktning är ännu inte utstakad. Låter sig de mönster som kan skönjas i utvecklingen under de senaste åren tolkas som att EU har tagit avgörande kliv mot ett federalt system, eller handlar det snarare om en utveckling i flera hastigheter? I en tid då EU står inför stora utmaningar är handlingskraften i dess befogenheter och bärigheten i politiska strukturer avgörande för framtiden. Dessa utmaningar ställer viktiga frågor på sin spets: utgör planerna att upprätta en europeisk försvarsunion, jämte inrättandet av en europeisk åklagarmyndighet avgörande steg bort från statssuveräniteten? Innebär den nya utformningen av EU:s statsstödsregler ett hot mot demokratin? Hur påverkar rättsstatskrisen integrationen i EU? Hur ser möjligheterna och utmaningarna ut för en gemensam skatte- och finanspolitik inom EU? Vilken roll spelar graden av ekonomisk jämlikhet för EU:s fortsatta utveckling? Finns det en fungerande parlamentarism i EU? Dessa och andra frågor belyses i den tjugofemte årgången av Europaperspektiv. Boken är tvärvetenskaplig och innehåller nio kapitel skrivna av forskare inom juridik, statskunskap och ekonomiska ämnen, som ur olika perspektiv analyserar den europeiska integrationens färdriktning.

Despite the recent economic upswing in many Latin American countries, rural poverty rates in the region have actually increased during the past two decades. Experts blame excessively centralized public administrations for the lackluster performance of public policy initiatives. In response, decentralization reformshave become a common government strategy for improving public sector performance in rural areas. The effect of these reforms is a topic of considerable debate among government officials, policy scholars, and citizens' groups. This book offers a systematic analysis of how local governments and farmer groups in Latin America are actually faring today. Based on interviews with more than 1,200 mayors, local officials, and farmers in 390 municipal territories in four Latin American nations, the authors analyze the ways in which different forms of decentralization affect the governance arrangements for rural development ""on the ground."" Their comparative analysis suggests that rural development outcomes are systemically linked to locally negotiated institutional arrangements—formal and informal—between government officials, NGOs, and farmer groups that operate in the local sphere. They find that local-government actors contribute to public services that better assist the rural poor when local actors cooperate to develop their own institutional arrangements for participatory planning, horizontal learning, and the joint production of services. This study brings substantive data and empirical analysis to a discussion that has, until now, more often depended on qualitative research in isolated cases. With more than 60 percent of Latin America's rural population living in poverty, the results are both timely and crucial.

What's wrong with foreign aid? Many policymakers, aid practitioners, and scholars have called into question its ability to increase economic growth, alleviate poverty, or promote social development. At the macro level, only tenuous links between development aid and improved living conditions have been found. At the micro level, only a few programs outlast donor support and even fewer appear to achieve lasting improvements. The authors of this book argue that much of aid's failure is related to the institutions that structure its delivery. These institutions govern the complex relationships between the main actors in the aid delivery system and often generate a series of perverse incentives that promote inefficient and unsustainable outcomes. In their analysis, the authors apply the theoretical insights of the new institutional economics to several settings. First, they investigate the institutions of Sida, the Swedish aid agency, to analyze how that aid agency's institutions can produce incentives inimical to desired outcomes, contrary to the desires of its own staff. Second, the authors use cases from India, a country with low aid dependence, and Zambia, a country with high aid dependence, to explore how institutions on the ground in recipient countries also mediate the effectiveness of aid. Throughout the book, the authors offer suggestions about how to improve aid's effectiveness. These suggestions include how to structure evaluations in order to improve outcomes, how to employ agency staff to gain from their on-the-ground experience, and how to engage stakeholders as "owners" in the design, resource mobilization, learning, and evaluation processes of development assistance programs.

What's wrong with foreign aid? Many policymakers, aid practitioners, and scholars have called into question its ability to increase economic growth, alleviate poverty, or promote social development. At the macro level, only tenuous links between development aid and improved living conditions have been found. At the micro level, only a few programs outlast donor support and even fewer appear to achieve lasting improvements. The authors of this book argue that much of aid's failure is related to the institutions that structure its delivery. These institutions govern the complex relationships between the main actors in the aid delivery system and often generate a series of perverse incentives that promote inefficient and unsustainable outcomes. In their analysis, the authors apply the theoretical insights of the new institutional economics to several settings. First, they investigate the institutions of Sida, the Swedish aid agency, to analyze how that aid agency's institutions can produce incentives inimical to desired outcomes, contrary to the desires of its own staff. Second, the authors use cases from India, a country with low aid dependence, and Zambia, a country with high aid dependence, to explore how institutions on the ground in recipient countries also mediate the effectiveness of aid. Throughout the book, the authors offer suggestions about how to improve aid's effectiveness. These suggestions include how to structure evaluations in order to improve outcomes, how to employ agency staff to gain from their on-the-ground experience, and how to engage stakeholders as "owners" in the design, resource mobilization, learning, and evaluation processes of development assistance programs.

In the field of international tax law, only a handful of scholars have had what it takes to actually affect policy. In recent decades, Sven-Olof Lodin is clearly among that distinct group. The influence of his work in the academic and business worlds has echoed far beyond his native Sweden (where he is honoured as one of the principal architects of the major tax reform of 1990) to the global context, where his great contribution has been signally recognized by his election in 1998 as the first Nordic president of the International Fiscal Association. He was a founding member of the Nordic Tax Research Council, which has done so much to ensure co-operation in tax matters between the Nordic countries. As a delegate of the Federation of Swedish Industries, he has participated in working groups at the European level and presented models of corporate taxation that are visible in EU tax policy. His colleagues and friends respect him not only for his achievements but also for the strong of justice that characterizes his radical proposals for reorientation of the tax system.In this festschrift, 25 tax law scholars from all over the world confront some of the problems that have preoccupied Lodin - cross-border income flows, tax treaties versus national codes, EC law versus national law, VAT, e-commerce income, and much more.