Kirjojen hintavertailu. Mukana 12 175 227 kirjaa ja 12 kauppaa.

Kirjailija

William Shelton

Kirjat ja teokset yhdessä paikassa: 19 kirjaa, julkaisuja vuosilta 2006-2024, suosituimpien joukossa Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution in Comparative Organizations. Vertaile teosten hintoja ja tarkista saatavuus suomalaisista kirjakaupoista.

19 kirjaa

Kirjojen julkaisuhaarukka 2006-2024.

Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution in Comparative Organizations

Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution in Comparative Organizations

Megan McKernan; Stephanie Young; Timothy R Heath; Dara Massicot; Andrew Dowse; Devon Hill; James Black; Ryan Consaul; Michael Simpson; Anthony Vassalo; Ivana Ke; Mark Stalczynski; Benjamin J Sacks; Austin Wyatt; Jade Yeung; Nicolas Jouan; Yuliya Shokh; William Shelton; Raphael S Cohen; John P Godges; Heidi Peters; Lauren Skrabala

RAND Corporation
2024
pokkari
The Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Reform asked the RAND Corporation for an independent analysis of PPBE-like functions in selected countries and non-Department of Defense federal agencies. This executive summary distills key insights from nine case studies of budgeting processes across comparative organizations, as detailed in three companion volumes.
Transforming Capability Requirements Development in the United States Space Force

Transforming Capability Requirements Development in the United States Space Force

Lauren A Mayer; Megan McKernan; Yool Kim; William Shelton; Jim Mignano; Arianne Collopy; Heidi Peters; Grace Van Valkenburg; Igor M Brin; Kristin J Leuschner

RAND Corporation
2024
pokkari
To achieve its core mission set and in the face of the rapid development of potential adversary capabilities in space, the U.S. Space Force (USSF) needs to fundamentally rethink how it defines requirements. To support this necessary transformation, the authors identify implementable changes to USSF capability requirements development that leverage best practices in requirements development and digital engineering.
Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Analysis

Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Analysis

Robert S. Tripp; Kristin F. Lynch; Daniel M. Romano; William Shelton; John A. Ausink; Chelsea Kaihoi Duran; Robert G. DeFeo; David W. George; Raymond E. Conley; Bernard Fox; Jerry M. Sollinger

RAND
2012
pokkari
A congressionally mandated review of the proposed restructuring of Air Force Materiel Command examined the proposal and its effect on life-cycle management, weapon system sustainment, and overall support to the warfighter. It also presents process improvement options to improve warfighter support and product development/support system design and operations support efficiencies, and it suggests organizational changes to facilitate their implementation.
Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution in Comparative Organizations

Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution in Comparative Organizations

Megan McKernan; Stephanie Young; Ryan Consaul; Michael Simpson; Anthony Vassalo; William Shelton; Devon Hill; Raphael S Cohen; John P Godges; Heidi Peters; Lauren Skrabala

RAND Corporation
2024
pokkari
This report, part of a four-volume set, presents case studies of planning, programming, budgeting, and execution (PPBE) functions in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to provide insights for improving the U.S. Department of Defense's PPBE processes.
Improving Integration and Synchronization of Space Acquisition and Fielding

Improving Integration and Synchronization of Space Acquisition and Fielding

Bonnie L Triezenberg; William Shelton; Megan McKernan; James Dimarogonas; Brian Dolan; Shane Manuel; Gwen Mazzotta; Sydne J Newberry; Laurinda L Rohn; Karen Schwindt; Yuliya Shokh; Jordan Willcox

RAND Corporation
2023
pokkari
A priority of the United States Space Force (USSF) is to improve vertical and horizontal integration and synchronization of space capabilities. To assist with this priority, the authors of this research defined existing challenges and recommended ways that USSF can facilitate the integration and synchronization of space acquisition and fielding to support the timely delivery of end-to-end space capabilities to the joint force.
Improving the Technical Requirements Development Process for Weapon Systems

Improving the Technical Requirements Development Process for Weapon Systems

Lauren A Mayer; William Shelton; Christian Johnson; Daniel Adducchio; Raza Khan; Suzanne Genc; Danielle C Tarraf; Nahom M Beyene

RAND Corporation
2022
pokkari
The acquisition process for a new weapon system begins with development of technical requirements to ensure that the system produced provides the needed operational capability within budget and schedule constraints. Oversights during this process can result in cost or schedule overruns, unsuitable operational performance, or outright cancellation. This report describes a systems-based approach to help improve this process.
A Clean Sheet Approach to Space Acquisition in Light of the New Space Force

A Clean Sheet Approach to Space Acquisition in Light of the New Space Force

William Shelton; Cynthia R Cook; Charlie Barton; Frank Camm; Kelly Elizabeth Eusebi; Diana Gehlhaus; Moon Kim; Yool Kim; Megan McKernan; Sydne Newberry; Colby P Steiner

RAND
2021
nidottu
The United States newest military service, the U.S. Space Force (USSF), has a unique opportunity to take advantage of the widening range of commercial capabilities and create a new culture and new management processes to respond to the growing challenges presented by potential adversaries in space. The authors describe an unconstrained ?clean sheet? approach to space acquisition for USSF designed around the new service's unique mission.
The Department of Defense Posture for Artificial Intelligence

The Department of Defense Posture for Artificial Intelligence

Danielle C Tarraf; William Shelton; Edward Parker

RAND
2020
nidottu
In this report, the authors assess the state of artificial intelligence (AI) relevant to DoD and address misconceptions about it; conduct an independent and introspective assessment of the Department of Defense's posture in AI; and put forth a set of recommendations for internal actions, external engagements, and potential legislative or regulatory actions that could enhance the Department of Defense posture in AI.
Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Nunn-Mccurdy Breach Root Cause Analysis and Portfolio Assessment Metrics for DOD Weapons Systems

Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Nunn-Mccurdy Breach Root Cause Analysis and Portfolio Assessment Metrics for DOD Weapons Systems

Jennifer Kavanagh; Megan McKErnan; Kathryn Connor; Abby Doll; Jeffrey A. Drezner; Kristy N. Kamarck; Katherine Pfrommer; Mark V. Arena; Irv Blickstein; William Shelton; Jerry M. Sollinger

RAND
2015
pokkari
The report contains two analyses. First, the authors examine the cause of a Nunn-McCurdy unit cost breach of the Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Inc. 1A major defense acquisition program. Second, they document a methodology to assess the performance of an acquisition portfolio. The methodology included identifying objectives, selecting data and metrics, and analyzing visualizations of portfolio performance.
Assessment of the Air Force Material Command Reorganization

Assessment of the Air Force Material Command Reorganization

Don Snyder; Bernard Fox; Kristin F. Lynch; Raymond E. Conley; John A. Ausink; Laura Werber; William Shelton; Sarah A. Nowak; Michael Thirtle; Albert A. Robbert

RAND
2013
pokkari
This report assesses the FY 2012 reorganization of the Air Force Material Command (AFMC), which was undertaken as one of the initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions by eliminating civilian manpower positions, thus achieving cost savings. One AFMC challenge was to absorb these cuts with minimal, if any, impact on its assigned missions in part by targeting staff positions.